Tel: 0161.443.4237  or  Mob: 07720.218846  
 
The MEPs, by a count of 621 votes to 10, gave their support to proposals for a new General Data Protection Regulation. A spokesperson for the Parliament confirmed to Out-Law.com that the proposals supported in the full plenary vote are the same as those outlined in a report of the Parliament's Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) Committee in October last year.

A new EU Directive vote was also held on plans for on Data Protection which if introduced, would separately set rules around personal data processing, by law enforcement bodies. A majority of 371 MEPs voted to support the new Directive, with 276 against the plans.

Under the LIBE Committee's proposals, businesses could face fines of up to 5% of their annual global turnover if they breach the new data protection laws. However, under the proposed plans businesses would be able to obtain a certification from (DPA) data protection authorities that their processing of personal data is compliant with the Regulation. Businesses that are issued with a valid 'European Data Protection Seal' would face immunity from fines for breaches of the Regulation unless the breach was "intentional" or involved "negligent noncompliance". 
Under the LIBE plans now backed by the full Parliament, the processing of personal data would be governed by a complicated legal framework. Strict rules around the processing of health data, as well as other 'special categories' of data, would be created. Separate rules would also apply if the personal data involved belonged to a child.

The plans include new rules around obtaining individuals' consent to the processing of their personal data, which some groups in the science sector in the UK previously expressed concern with.

If introduced, the LIBE proposals, would also update existing rules that govern transfers of personal data outside of the European Economic Area (EEA). Companies would be required to obtain regulatory approval to transfer personal data outside of the EEA to countries that have not been approved as having adequate data protection measures in place. A number of legal mechanisms and safeguards could be adopted to permit the transfer to take place without the need for approval, however. 

A new 'one stop shop' regulatory regime would also be established, under the plans, which would allow businesses to engage with just one data protection authority (DPA) – the one based in the country of their main establishment – instead of each DPA in every EU country in which they operate.

However, reforms to the data protection regime cannot happen unless both the European Parliament and the EU's Council of Ministers, which is made up of representatives of individual member states, both agree on a single set of proposals.

The Council of Ministers has so far been unable to reach a consensus amongst its members on what a new data protection framework in the EU should look like. A number of different views have been expressed in particular over how the 'one stop shop' regulatory regime should work in practice. The UK government has also expressed concern about the suitability of proposed rules governing data transfers for the digital age.

In a statement, for the Parliament on the General Data Protection Regulation Jan Phillip Albrecht said it would be "irresponsible" of the Council to further postpone reform.

"The citizens of Europe expect us to deliver a strong EU wide data protection regulation," Albrecht said. "If there are some member states which do not want to deliver after two years of negotiations, the majority should go ahead without them."

In a separate development, MEPs also voted to support a report the LIBE Committee published on their findings into the allegations of mass surveillance by the US' National Security Agency (NSA).

In a press conference, UK MEP Claude Moraes confirmed that the final report backed by the Parliament, in a vote of 544 MEPs to 78, was slightly amended from the one that he had previously drafted. However, he confirmed that the "digital bill of rights" which had been supported did call for the suspension of the EU-US Safe Harbour scheme on data transfers. It also called for the US to recognise EU citizens' rights to redress over the misuse of their data by a US company.

The Parliament's vote also confirmed MEPs' support for the suspension of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme (TFTP) agreement until there is clarity on allegations that US authorities gained access to EU citizens' payments data outside of the procedures outlined in the agreement.

The TFTP allows, in accordance with certain protocols, US law enforcement bodies to access data held in Europe, by the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT), which co-ordinates payments between financial institutions based across the world.


Source: out-law.com
 


Comments

04/29/2014 9:57am

Sounds like Europe trying to dictate to the UK again, we should make and uphold our own laws and not necessarily have to follow everything that European Commissions decide upon.

Reply
Donie
05/07/2014 4:28am

Data protection is exactly our nation has to consider too, not only in EU but also the entire continents. Although, it may cause debatable issue of data security between conservatives and democrats likewise with EU Comm but in general, it is not a bad agenda. You might not know, it can demolish corrupt people, retain integrity and peace to our land.

Reply
jonterns
05/26/2014 7:30pm

The new age of technology is here and along with it come some new laws and regulations that we must all know about. Thank you for posting this, it shows a lot of the changes that were made and how they can affect every one of us.

Reply
shaun wright
05/26/2014 8:45pm

I think that a part of this is necessary but it seems like it goes a little too far with some of the allowances that are made for foreign countries.

Reply
08/04/2014 8:36am

I like your blog thanks for sharing me this article…

Reply
11/01/2014 6:37pm

Nice site you have. A lot of interesting information from you.

Reply

Once your site meets the basic SEO guidelines, it's then time to consider how your site is seen by users, and how it compares and interacts with other sites on the web.

Reply
05/19/2016 9:07am


Have patience. All things are difficult before they become easy

Reply
11/15/2016 4:53pm

This is my first time that I am reading anything about the law and order. It’s a great thing to read new things every time and it helps you to know about different new and great things. I am happy that I am getting interesting knowledge about the law and order in this blog now.

Reply
12/11/2016 12:07pm

I have heard about the European Parliament and the Data Protection law they have there,The disability laws California has made some of my objectives more clear after reading the content,Thanks for sharing the article,I will always get them in my mind straight.

Reply
01/19/2017 12:44pm

So, in the event that you are anticipating acquiring a tract of land in Missouri, the initial step is check for every one of the spots, their area, atmosphere, recreational open doors accessible there or rather the exceptional components of the place, its availability to other vital zones and in light of the majority of the above, you can pick an area for further thought.

Reply

In the event that you don't have no less than 20 percent to use as an up front installment on your West Virginia home loan advance, your moneylender may oblige you to convey private home loan protection.

Reply

Property Improvement Insurance Loans are HUD protected from affirmed moneylenders. These credits are implied for recovery of existing properties including fabricated homes, single and multifamily homes and non-private structures.

Reply



Leave a Reply